A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year and a fine of fifty thousand won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Punishment of the crime

From around 194, the Defendant, as a public institution affiliated with the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy (entrusted quasi-government agency) from around 1994, has been in charge of affairs concerning support projects, etc. for various design-related enterprises, such as the convention head, the corporate support team leader, the design service team, the policy-making team leader, the strategic research team leader, the policy-making team leader, the group leader of the Korea-DESGN promotion team, the D head, the head of the group, and the head of the living industry convergence office, etc., while working as a public institution in charge of the promotion and promotion project of the development of industrial designs.

On April 2015, the Defendant, as the head of C’s D, was in charge of various support projects, etc. for design-related enterprises, received cash 2 million won from the Defendant, along with the Defendant’s solicitation to the effect that, at the “E restaurant located in the seat of the headquarters of the Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government SCCC Card (State), FF representative G of the H project (State) so that F (State) can be selected as a participant enterprise, and (State) the Defendant continued to (State) allow F (State) to select a participant enterprise as a participant enterprise, and (State) to provide various convenience, such as internal information on the business support and policies promoted by C so that F (State) may be selected as a participant enterprise.”

In addition, the Defendant received a total of KRW 24 million from August 2007 to September 2015, 15, in total, 15 times under the pretext of solicitation to request the Defendant to select as an object of the corporate support project (State) managed by FF from August 2007 to September 3, 2015.

Accordingly, the defendant received a bribe in relation to his duties as an officer or employee of C who is a public institution deemed as a public official.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Each prosecutor's statement concerning G, I, J, and K;

1. Copies of non-funded account books related to the grant of A bribe;

1. Printeds on the C Internet homepage;

1.The status of F’s selection of national subsidy projects;