logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 목포지원 2018.02.13 2014고단1962
배임수재등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment of one year and six months, Defendant B's imprisonment of two years, Defendant C's imprisonment of ten months, and Defendant D of fine of three years.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Presumption Facts] The Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy, as a national policy to promote the new growth power industry through securing the competitiveness of new renewable energy technology, is to support the development of technology in 11 areas. Among this, the D industry task is to build a domestic first H in the G located at the sea of Jindo-gun, Jindo-gun, which is the subject of F under the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy, and I, as the ordering authority of the said development task, as the project cost of 16.5 billion won from June 2010 to October 2014, as the ordering authority of the said development task, has to complete the “J Corporation” by inserting the project cost of 16.5 billion won (government contribution of 7.18 billion won).

[2] Defendant A is the chief of the technical department of the I electronic system headquarters, the aforesaid “E” R& & ; and Defendant B is a person working as the head of the working-level team in relation to D industrial tasks, and Defendant B is a person operating K in substance, a corporation that received supervision services, and Defendant C is the representative director of M of the business execution headquarters, a corporation that received from I the “L Corporation” (hereinafter “L Corporation”).

1. Defendant A and Defendant B’s joint crime are the head of the technical department of the I electronic system headquarters, who is engaged in the task of exercising overall control over the foregoing “E” R&D; and thus, Defendant A and the head of the headquarters of the I electronic system headquarters is not entitled to obtain property or property benefits in return for an unlawful solicitation in connection with their duties.

Defendant

A around February 2, 2012, sent Lwork drawings to the representative C of M Co., Ltd., and offered that “A shall submit a construction plan and make it possible to perform construction works if it is well,” and C submitted a written estimate equivalent to KRW 3.4 billion. However, upon the revision of the above L Work drawings, C submitted a written estimate that the above L Work may be executed at KRW 2.7 billion on April 2012.

Defendant

B On April 2012, 2012, “The expenses may be reduced as advance payment if the expenses are to be incurred in addition to the construction expenses.”

The report shall be asked "," and C shall be difficult to make a good payment.

arrow