1. The Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 50,00,000 and the interest rate of KRW 15% per annum from March 10, 2016 to the date of complete payment.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The plaintiff is a juristic person established for the purpose of supporting the operation of self-supporting workplace for the disabled, and has several branch offices including the plaintiff B Association branch offices, and the above branch offices are set up in C branch offices, and the defendant's assistant intervenor is the representative of C branch offices. 2) On the other hand, the defendant's assistant association is registered as a separate juristic person under the name of D branch office. However, the address of the above juristic person is the same as the plaintiff's association branch office, and the above juristic person is a branch office, and appointed the defendant's assistant intervenor as the representative of the above branch office.

B. (1) The Defendant’s Intervenor entered into an insurance contract for fidelity guarantee (hereinafter “instant contract”) around January 201, 201: (a) around the Plaintiff’s assistant intervenor and the guarantor’s assistant intervenor set the Plaintiff’s branch director, the insured’s branch director, and the Plaintiff’s insurance period from January 1, 201 to December 31, 2013; and (b) KRW 50,000,000 as the purchase price of the insurance (hereinafter “instant contract”).

(2) According to the terms and conditions of the instant contract, the Defendant shall compensate the Plaintiff for direct property damage (including damage incurred by the Plaintiff’s liability to compensate for legal damage due to the said cause) arising from the Plaintiff’s conduct of larceny, robbery, fraud, embezzlement, or breach of trust during the insurance period or by taking advantage of his/her position in performing his/her duties, as indicated in the insurance policy and in accordance with the said terms and conditions.

(Article 1). (c)

The Defendant Intervenor’s tort 1) The Defendant Intervenor committed a tort against the Defendant Intervenor: (a) the Korea Employment Agency for Disabled Persons (hereinafter “Employment Agency”) by means of falsely preparing and submitting relevant documents, even if the employees with disabilities working at the workplace operated by the Plaintiff’s C Branch were employed under the conditions that

The Seoul Southern Vice-Governor deceivings the employee in charge of the affairs.