1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 59,946,00 for the Plaintiff and 5% per annum from September 3, 2015 to September 10, 2015; and (b) from the following day.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Defendant, as indicated in the attached Table from April 2013 to December 2013, had disabled workers work at the place of business of a church operated by the Plaintiff, as a person operating B branch under the Plaintiff, and had them work at the place of business of a church operated by the Plaintiff.

B. On May 28, 2013, the Defendant: (a) prepared a written pledge stating that “the Defendant shall faithfully implement the B business unit’s business; (b) the Defendant shall faithfully file a false application related to the employment incentive of persons with disabilities with the business unit; and (c) any other issues, such as false application and fraudulent supply and demand; and (d) the work negligence and public services; and (e) the issue of private matters, and (e) the Plaintiff shall be liable and liable for all damages.”

(hereinafter referred to as “instant written oath”) C.

In addition, on August 9, 2013, the Plaintiff prepared a letter of undertaking with the Defendant and authenticated it by a notary public at No. 3036, 2013, 2013.

(hereinafter referred to as the “instant undertaking” and the contents of the instant undertaking pertaining to the instant case are as follows). The Plaintiff and the Plaintiff Branch shall undertake the following tasks:

1. The plaintiff B promises not to commit any illegal act in supervising the business as part of the creation of employment for disabled persons, and promises that all the responsibilities arising in the course of carrying out the business after this undertaking will be borne by the plaintiff A (the defendant), who is the head of the business group.

In addition, all civil and criminal responsibilities arising from the implementation of all projects are irrelevant to the Plaintiff, and the location of responsibility is confirmed to the Defendant, who is the head of the Plaintiff’s chapter B project.

However, the Defendant, as indicated in the [Attachment 1] No. 1 on September 12, 2013, had disabled workers work as indicated in the annexed Table No. 1, and paid a total of KRW 23,536,450 to them, instead of having paid the benefits, prepared an application for the payment of the employment incentive for disabled persons, and subsequently, prepared an application for the payment of the employment incentive for disabled persons and “Employment Agency