A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

To order the defendant to complete a sexual assault treatment program for 80 hours.

Punishment of the crime

On September 9, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years on September 20, 2016, for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (dacting driving) in the support for the development of the methods of water sources, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on September 20, 2016.

From May 2016, the Defendant came to death with the victim B (V, 24 years old) working in the same workplace.

On September 2016, the Defendant, in a hotel hotel D with the fifth floor of gallon C building, galloned off the clothes above gallon 5 smartphones by using a camera function of gallon 5 smartphones, taken by hand the part of the victim’s sound, and the part of the victim’s telegraph and knife with a photo or video, taken by the victim’s telegraph and knife with a knife, and taken by video the knife with a knife with a knife with a smartphone.

Accordingly, the defendant taken the body of the victim who could cause sexual humiliation or shame by using a camera, against his will.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against B;

1. Copy of the complaint;

1. Do image closure photographs and photographs;

1. Details of conversation;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of inquiry letter, such as criminal history (A), investigation report, and Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes and Article 14 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes concerning the crime;

1. After Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 39 (1) of the same Act:

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 16(2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes Committed to order to complete a program shows an attitude that the defendant misleads himself/herself and reflects his/her wrongness.

However, in light of the contents and methods of the crime of this case, the responsibility for the crime of this case is heavy.

The Defendant’s wrong disclosure of the instant pictures, images, etc. was caused by the leakage to the outside, thereby causing additional damage to F by the victim.

However, the defendant, who maintains a marital relationship with F, was serious for the recovery of damage.