logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2018.08.16 2018고단974 (1)
성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(카메라등이용촬영)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

The defendant shall be ordered to complete the sexual assault treatment program for 40 hours.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 13, 2017, the Defendant is a person who was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for six months and is under suspension of execution for two years for a violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes in the Ulsan District Court on July 13, 201.

1. Violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (hereinafter “D convenience store”), around 22:30 on February 13, 2018, the Defendant taken a 16 victim E (the 22 years old), following the Defendant’s son E (the 22 years old), the species containing the Defendant’s opon 6 smartphones, in a dynamic image, by inserting the copon of the copon of the copon of the copon of the copon of the copon, from the above day to the 12:20 on February 21, 2018, the Defendant taken the copon of the 16 victims of the copon of the copon of the copon of the copon of the copon of the victim.

As a result, the defendant taken the body of another person, who could cause sexual humiliation or shame, using a camera or other similar mechanism, against his will.

2. Violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (Ameras, etc.) (hereinafter “G”), the Defendant, on February 19, 2018, posted goods within “G” cosmetics located in Ulsan-gu F, Ulsan-gu, Seoul-gu, Seoul-do, and attempted to take a fluoric image by putting the fluor of the Defendant’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’

As a result, the Defendant intended to take photographs of another person’s body, which may cause sexual humiliation or shame, against his will, using a camera or other similar mechanism, but did not commit such intent.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant in the first trial record;

arrow