1. The plaintiff (appointed)'s claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the plaintiff (appointed party).

1. The plaintiff's assertion

A. On September 2014, the Plaintiff intended to promote consulting services on the use of the land in Gwangju-gu Seoul as a site for the construction project of multi-family housing with the selector B of the end of September, 2014, and proposed a review on the construction project of multi-family housing to the Defendant

(hereinafter referred to as “Plaintiff, etc.”) b. by referring to Plaintiff and Selection B.

Plaintiff

On October 2, 2014, the Defendant submitted data, such as the cadastral map, urban planning map, building placement map, design drawing, and balance analysis sheet of the instant site to D, who is in charge of the Defendant Company, and entered into a consulting service contract with the Defendant on October 2, 2014 regarding the instant project at KRW 200 million (excluding value-added tax).

C. Accordingly, on October 7, 2014, the instant service contract was concluded by the Defendant, such as submission of a letter of intent to purchase the instant site, and the Plaintiff, etc. concluded a specific negotiation on the purchase of land to a clan related person who is the owner of the instant site, and issued a revised design drawing at the Defendant’s request, and performed services, such as the possibility of granting permission for the construction of multi-family housing, and the recognition of a loan to cover the land purchase fund. However, the Defendant unilaterally reversed the instant service contract on November 19, 2014.

Plaintiff

As above, the Defendant is obligated to pay to the Plaintiff KRW 182,00,000, and the 18,000,000,000 to the Appointed B in accordance with the ratio of profit distribution by the Plaintiff, etc., as well as damages for delay.

2. Comprehensively taking account of each description of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3 and 9, and witness D’s testimony, the Plaintiff, etc. planned to provide consulting services with regard to the promotion of apartment housing construction projects by making part of the land of the Nam-gu, Gwangju, which is owned by the Equiries and Fmun-gu around the end of September 2014 as the site, and then planned to provide the Defendant with consulting services.