1. In relation to the designated parties F, Defendant D’s KRW 9,450,00, Defendant E’s KRW 3,600,000, and each of them, from February 13, 2011 to February 13, 201.

The main point of the Plaintiff’s assertion on the claim of the designated company is that the relevant Plaintiff, the designated parties (hereinafter referred to as “Plaintiffs”) and H have provided so-called real estate consulting services, such as arranging the transaction of land available for development and helping the delivery of land, in the first place of Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government I (hereinafter “I”) for the construction executor’s side.

On July 29, 2010, the claimant (J, K-related) company entered into a consulting service agreement with the defendant company on the land J and K with the defendant company, and provided services, such as arranging the defendant company to purchase each of the above land in KRW 6,670,00,000, and received 2% of the purchase price of the land (excluding value added tax).

As the designated company provided the service, the Defendant company could purchase the 6,520,000,000 won which was lower than the estimated purchase price on July 30, 2010 and August 3, 2010 and the 6,520,000,000 and the K each land (the J land is a stock company designated by the Defendant company).

Therefore, Defendant Company should pay 123,440,000 won (i.e., 6,520,000,000 won x 2% x 110% including value-added tax x 10%) for the designated company and delay damages after October 31, 2010 (the remainder date under a sales contract).

The claimant company against Defendant D entered into a consulting service contract with Defendant D under the same conditions, and Defendant D entered into a sales contract with Defendant D to purchase L land in KRW 2,100,000,000 on February 12, 201 after being provided services by the designated company.

Therefore, Defendant D should pay 46,200,000 won (i.e., 2,100,000,000 x 2% x 110% including value-added tax) for consulting services and delay damages from June 14, 2011.

The designated parties to the claim (M-related) against the defendant E are the same.