logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2017.11.24 2017고단1530
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주치상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant in violation of the Automobile Management Act did not file an application for the registration of transfer of ownership of the said passenger vehicle within 15 days after he received the last car from the person who was influent to his name, in the Daeyang-gu apartment parking lot located in the Mayang-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, from his name and influent.

As a result, the Defendant did not apply to the Mayor/Do Governor for the registration of transfer of the ownership of a motor vehicle without justifiable grounds despite the acquisition of registered

2. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of the first car in B in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Egressing Vehicle) and the Road Traffic Act (Egress after accidents).

On February 22, 2015, the Defendant driven the said car without obtaining a driver’s license of the said car, and was driving the instant car along the U.S. road in front of the U.S. Park in Gwangjuyang-Eup at the time of lightyang-do along the intersection from the intersection of the U.S. Do to the intersection of the U.S. market private distance from the intersection of the U.S. 3-lane.

At the time, since it is an intersection where a signal is installed at night and at that time, there was a duty of care to make a safe internship in order not to obstruct the passage of vehicles that come from the opposite part by reducing speed and checking the right and the right and the right of the driver.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and brought up the part of the victim C(40) driving, which was proceeding in accordance with the new subparagraph, due to the negligence of the U.S., to the right side of the Defendant’s driver’s car, the upper part of the victim C(40) driving, which was proceeding in accordance with the new subparagraph.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim due to the above occupational negligence during approximately two weeks of medical treatment, and at the same time, the Defendant destroyed the victim’s car and escaped without taking necessary measures, such as aiding the damaged party’s car and aiding the damaged party, even though the repair cost is equivalent to KRW 870,000, such as the exchange of the front driver, etc.

3...

arrow