Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months, and imprisonment with prison labor for six months.

except that, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

A. On August 14, 2016, the Defendant injured the victim C at the “E” restaurant located in Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si on August 14, 2016, according to the head of the Victim C (A, 47 years old), who was suffering from a physical disease due to his/her own shock while having a dispute with the Defendant’s daily behaviors, and was sitting in the next table, the Defendant inflicted an injury on the victim C, such as a sugar, where there was no two-day medical treatment for about two weeks.

B. On August 14, 2016, Defendant A, who sustained obstruction of performance of official duties and injury to victim F, is above the victim A around 20:55.

At the parking lot in front of the restaurant as stated in the port, the above C expressed the victim F(31 years of age) and the slope H expressed that “Ps shall be assigned to the scene and to verify the details of the report,” and that “Psss shall open the patrol gate and be investigated by the police officer,” and “Psss shall open the police gate and be investigated by the police officer,” and 5 times of walking the police gate driven by the above police officer, which was driven by the police officer, taken the victim’s behavior, and she took three times of the victim’s chest.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the prevention, suppression, and investigation of crimes, and at the same time, the Defendant placed approximately two weeks off the right tights that require medical treatment to the victim.

2. Defendant B’s Defendant 1-B

At the time, at the time, at the place, and at the place specified in the port, she reported that she would restrain she from the above slope H, and that she expressed that she “the she shall see she to see she, she shall do so, she shall do so, she shall do so, she shall do so, and she shall she shall do so.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the prevention and suppression of police officers' crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement of H and F (a list of 8,10);

1. C’s statement (List 19);

1. Each written diagnosis (list 18,20);

1. Investigation report (List 21);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs (list 3);

1. Article 257 of the relevant Act concerning criminal facts A: Article 257 of the Criminal Act.