logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2015.01.16 2014고정1395
업무방해
Text

The sentence of punishment against the Defendants shall be suspended separately.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the mother of Defendant B, Defendant E, Defendant C, and Defendant D, and the victim G is the wife of Defendant A’s deceased Ha, and the Defendants and victims are under litigation as the issue of H’s death insurance and the right to operate the restaurant.

1. On December 18, 2013, Defendants A and E were found to be the “J cafeteria” operated by the victim in Songpa-gu Seoul on December 18, 2013. Defendant A was unable to have a disturbance, such as the following: (a) Defendant A claimed insurance money; (b) was collected on the floor of a mix containing a large amount of excreta; and (c) Defendant E entered the restaurant, stating that “I are frightd and fright, and will not be frighted.”

As a result, the Defendants conspired with and by force interfered with the restaurant business of women.

2. On January 8, 2014, Defendants A, E, C, and D jointly committed offenses were found in the above restaurant around 11:00, and Defendant E, C, and Defendant D did not have any disturbance, such as “I will not perform any funeral on the spot.” The Defendant E, Defendant C, and Defendant D, who entered the restaurant at the front of the entrance, stated that “I will not perform any funeral on the spot.”

As a result, the Defendants conspired with and by force interfered with the restaurant business of women.

3. Defendant A, Defendant B, Defendant E, Defendant C, and Defendant D’s co-principaled Defendants were found in the above restaurant around 18:00 on January 8, 2014, and they did not have any disturbance, such as “I would like to find the victim “I would have died in south,” and Defendant E, Defendant C, and Defendant D were ever on the entrance, and entered the restaurant in front of each of them.”

As a result, the Defendants conspired with and by force interfered with the restaurant business of women.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. The police statement concerning G;

1. A complaint;

1. Investigation report (Submission of additional documentary evidence by a complainant);

arrow