beta
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit
Seoul High Court-2016-Nu67174 (Law No. 13, 2017)
Title
(Resceptic Conduct)
Summary
(The main point of view) It is difficult to recognize that each fifth level of the fifth level of the commercial building portion among the documents submitted by the Plaintiff was used as a residence for the purpose of residence, or that the structure, function, facilities, etc. of the building are in a state suitable for residence as its original residential purpose and is maintained and managed as it is.
Cases
2017Du43760 Revocation of Disposition of Imposing capital gains tax
Plaintiff-Appellant
김〇〇
Defendant-Appellee
〇〇세무서장
Judgment of the lower court
Seoul High Court Decision 2016Nu67174 Decided April 13, 2017
Imposition of Judgment
August 23, 2017
Text
The appeal is dismissed.
The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.
Reasons
The records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined. However, the grounds of appeal on the grounds of appeal are not included in the grounds stipulated in each subparagraph of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed pursuant to Article 5 of the Act. It is so decided as per Disposition