beta
Text
1. The Defendants jointly and severally agreed to the Plaintiff KRW 250,000,000 and Defendant B Co., Ltd. with respect thereto from November 29, 2012.
Reasons
1. Claim against Defendant B corporation
A. The Plaintiff indicated the claim to Defendant B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant B”) lent KRW 250 million in total, including KRW 80 million on August 2, 2005, KRW 80 million on September 8, 2005, KRW 35 million on September 23, 2005, KRW 15 million on September 30, 2005, KRW 200 million on September 30, 2005, and KRW 20 million on September 2005.
(b) Judgment by service (Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act);
2. Claim against Defendant C
A. Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the arguments in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3 (including additional numbers) and Eul evidence Nos. 1, as to the cause of the claim, the defendant C acquired the defendant Eul in the name of his wife and carried out the construction of the apartment of this case around Aug. 2, 2004, the plaintiff decided to lend the construction cost of the apartment of this case to the defendant Eul, and the plaintiff loaned the construction cost of the apartment of this case to the defendant Eul up to Sep. 8, 2005, the amount of KRW 80 million on Sep. 23, 2005, KRW 5 million on Sep. 23, 2005, KRW 15 million on Sep. 30, 2005, KRW 2.5 million on Sep. 30, 2005, and KRW 2.6 million on Sep. 26, 200 to the loan account of the plaintiff up to 3 million on Feb. 6, 2006.
B. Defendant C, at around 2005, delegated the instant apartment project to Defendant C at the time of Defendant C’s argument, to Defendant C’s apartment project. Defendant C, who borrowed money from the Plaintiff in the course of the project, is irrelevant to the above loan, and Defendant C merely prepared and executed a written statement of repayment of the loan in an intentional sense, i.e., the Plaintiff was able to recover and receive money from the Plaintiff in 2006. Thus, Defendant C did not have any obligation to repay the loan.
In this regard, a disposal document is authentic.