1. The defendant's written instrument No. 6241, and No. 722 and the same document against the plaintiff of 2005.

Basic Facts

On November 3, 2005, a notarial deed for loans for consumption (Law Firm No. 6241, 2005; hereinafter "1notarial deed") stating the purport of recognizing compulsory execution at the time of delay was prepared on December 3, 2005, which is the defendant, debtor D (the mother of the plaintiff), and joint and several sureties, the amount of debt KRW 5 million, the interest rate of KRW 60% per annum, and 60% per annum, and the purport of recognizing compulsory execution at the time of delay of performance. At the time of preparation of 1 authentic deed, D puts his signature and seal on the indication of the plaintiff's representative in the indication of the plaintiff's representative, and the above notarial deed is identical to the contents of the above notarial deed, with the proxy's seal imprint affixed with the plaintiff's seal imprint affixed (hereinafter "one delegation letter"), 200, 2005, 205, 205, 360% per annum, 205, 2005, 3605,

2. At the time of the preparation of a notarial deed, D signed and sealed by the relevant party in the indication column as the Plaintiff’s agent. On December 28, 2005, the contents of the notarial deed are the same as those of the above notarial deed, a power of attorney with the Plaintiff’s seal imprint affixed thereon (hereinafter referred to as “second power of attorney”), and a certificate of personal seal impression as to the Plaintiff’s seal imprint for the official column (hereinafter referred to as “two certificates of personal seal impression”) are attached to the said notarial deed.

On August 17, 2006, the purport of recognizing compulsory execution is stated in the defendant, debtor, and joint and several sureties E (the father of the plaintiff), D, debt amount of KRW 135 million, due date of payment of KRW 135 million, December 25, 2006, annual interest rate of 60%, and delay of performance.