logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2014.07.14 2014고정744
정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. No person who violates the Act on Promotion, etc. of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection shall allow any person to reach another person repeatedly in the form of code, words, sound, image, or picture creating fear or apprehension through information and communications networks;

Nevertheless, at around 20:40 on December 26, 2013, the Defendant sent a text message to the victim’s cell phone (F) stating that “If the victim E, who is the former wife divorced by using the Defendant’s cell phone (D), is a person suffering from another male in the past, the Defendant sent to the victim’s cell phone (F) a text message stating that “if the Defendant’s cell phone (GH) is a person who is a bad person in the Republic of Korea, it shall be said that it would be the one in the form of internal and direct text messages, the staff of the office, wind, wind, and wind, etc.).” From that time until December 29:34, 2013, the Defendant sent text message to the victim nine times in total, as indicated in the list of crimes, by sending text messages to the victim at the information and communications network.

2. Defamation;

A. At around 11:00 on December 26, 2013, the Defendant damaged the honor of the victims by openly pointing out false facts by publicly pointing out false information to the J, a workplace employee, “I is going to the Republic of Korea since three years ago, and is destroying our home,” even though there was no fact that the victim E committed the victim I and the Buddhist wheels with the victim.”

B. On December 26, 2013, the Defendant damaged the honor of the victims by openly pointing out false facts by stating that “E and I destroyed the household because they have less wheels,” even though there was no fact that the victim E did not commit the victim’s I and the son.”

C. The Defendant on December 2013

arrow