1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. In the course of the disposition, the following facts: (a) the Plaintiff’s entry into the Republic of Liberia: (b) visa exemption (B-1) on February 18, 2016 of the date of application for refugee status exemption (hereinafter “instant disposition”); (b) on April 18, 2016 of the date of application for refugee status recognition (hereinafter “instant disposition”); (c) there is no dispute over the grounds for recognition of refugee status non-recognition: (d) there is no ground for recognition of the decision to dismiss the notification of the decision of October 27, 2016 of the date of application for objection, as of October 18, 2016 of the date of application for objection; (b) the entries in subparagraphs 1, 2, and 1, 2, and 3; and (b) the purport of the entire pleadings, as of the entire pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion is a national of the Republic of Liberia (hereinafter “Liberia”).

The plaintiff was changed from Muslim to Suslim.

As such, the father of the plaintiff, who is a slicker, tried to kill the plaintiff.

The plaintiff entered the Republic of Korea regardless of damage Liberia.

As such, since the Plaintiff’s return to Liberia is likely to be persecution, it should be recognized as a refugee.

B. Determination 1) Article 2 Subparag. 1 of the Refugee Act defines refugee status as “a foreigner who is unable to be protected or does not want to be protected by the country of nationality due to well-founded fear to recognize that he/she may be injured on the grounds of race, religion, nationality, membership of a specific social group, or political opinion, or a foreigner who is a state of nationality not having been unable to return to or does not want to return to the country in which he/she had resided before entering the Republic of Korea due to such fear.” 2) In full view of the aforementioned evidence and evidence in subparagraph 4 as well as the following circumstances revealed by adding the purport of the pleading to the statement in subparagraph 4, it is difficult to view that the Plaintiff “a well-founded fear of being injured on the grounds of race, religion, nationality, membership of a specific social group, or political opinion,” and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.