Text
The defendant is innocent.
Reasons
1. The summary of the facts charged:
A. On June 10, 2004, around 03:40 around 03:40, the Defendant’s employee violated the restriction on the operation of the vehicle of the road management agency by operating the A truck in excess of 16.7 meters in length exceeding 32.0 meters in length;
B.1) On August 9, 2006, at the control station of vehicles for the 38-line mobile traffic restriction (influence) on the road of Pyeongtaek-si, Gyeonggi-do around 02:20, the Defendant’s employee violated the restrictions on the operation of the road management agency by operating a vehicle with a width exceeding 2.50 meters exceeding 2.50 meters; 2) on September 4, 2006, around 22:10, at the control office of traffic on the 3-line mobile vehicles on the new road of the 3-line (limited on the operation of the 3-line mobile road of the 3-line mobile road of the 3-line mobile road of the 3-line mobile 10: The Defendant’s employee violated the restrictions on the operation of the road management agency by operating the vehicle of the 3-meter mobile 50 meters wide exceeding 2.50 meters, and the employee of the road management agency of the 3-party mobile 1:6-party mobile 25:00 meters beyond the 3-party 1.
C. On February 1, 2007, around 01:30, the Defendant’s employee violated the restriction on the operation of the vehicle of the road management agency by operating a freight truck exceeding 16 meters in length and 4 meters in width and 21.40 meters in width, and 5.10 meters in width, in front of the Dog-ri, Kag-ri, Mag-ri, Magdong, Kimhae-si, Kimhae-si.
D. On March 30, 2007