logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2016.08.17 2016고단2055
도로법위반
Text

The defendant is innocent.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged:

A. On June 10, 2004, around 03:40 around 03:40, the Defendant’s employee violated the restriction on the operation of the vehicle of the road management agency by operating the A truck in excess of 16.7 meters in length exceeding 32.0 meters in length;

B.1) On August 9, 2006, at the control station of vehicles for the 38-line mobile traffic restriction (influence) on the road of Pyeongtaek-si, Gyeonggi-do around 02:20, the Defendant’s employee violated the restrictions on the operation of the road management agency by operating a vehicle with a width exceeding 2.50 meters exceeding 2.50 meters; 2) on September 4, 2006, around 22:10, at the control office of traffic on the 3-line mobile vehicles on the new road of the 3-line (limited on the operation of the 3-line mobile road of the 3-line mobile road of the 3-line mobile road of the 3-line mobile 10: The Defendant’s employee violated the restrictions on the operation of the road management agency by operating the vehicle of the 3-meter mobile 50 meters wide exceeding 2.50 meters, and the employee of the road management agency of the 3-party mobile 1:6-party mobile 25:00 meters beyond the 3-party 1.

C. On February 1, 2007, around 01:30, the Defendant’s employee violated the restriction on the operation of the vehicle of the road management agency by operating a freight truck exceeding 16 meters in length and 4 meters in width and 21.40 meters in width, and 5.10 meters in width, in front of the Dog-ri, Kag-ri, Mag-ri, Magdong, Kimhae-si, Kimhae-si.

D. On March 30, 2007

arrow