logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 목포지원 2016.06.27 2016고단342
도로법위반
Text

Defendants shall be acquitted respectively.

Reasons

1. The specification of the facts charged

A. On February 22, 1994, around 18:15, around February 22, 1994, of A, an employee of the Defendant 2016 senior group 342, a violation of restrictions on the operation of vehicles prior to the inspection stations of traffic congestions, if the employees of the Defendant 2016 senior group 342 metrep.

B. A violation of restriction on the operation of vehicles in front of the main office, branch office, main office, and main office of the construction project, located in Korea at a point of 119 km in the 19k radius from June 19, 1993, which is around 00:58, which is an employee of the Defendant 345 senior group, among the employees of the Defendant 2016 senior group;

2. Since punishment laws applicable to each summary order subject to review have lost effect retroactively according to the Constitutional Court’s decision of unconstitutionality, each of the defendants shall be acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow