Plaintiff (Attorney Cho Jae-won, Counsel for the plaintiff-appellant)

Changwon Market (Law Firm Future, Attorneys Kim Jong-su et al., Counsel for the plaintiff-appellant)

April 4, 2013

Changwon District Court Decision 2012Guhap681 Decided September 13, 2012

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The decision of the first instance court is revoked. On August 17, 1999, the defendant confirmed that the decision of the residential site for the person eligible for general preferential sale against the plaintiff is invalid.

1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;

The reasoning of this court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except with the fact that "I do not have any "(see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2009Nu3101, Nov. 6, 2009)" as "I do not have any "(see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2009Nu3101, Nov. 6, 2009)." Thus, it is acceptable in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation

2. Conclusion

Therefore, the judgment of the first instance court is justifiable, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

Judges Jin Sung-sung (Presiding Judge)