A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On May 23, 2014, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 300,00,000 as a result of the crime of interference with business from the branch court of Suwon District Court.

1. Obstruction of business of convenience points;

A. From 03:00 to 05:00 at the end of June, 2015, the Defendant: (a) expressed in the “C convenience store” where the victim E works in thischeon-si from the end of 03:0 to 05:00, the Defendant expressed an influence to the influent customers who want to sit in the tables and enter the convenience store by standing in the tables; (b) Macju’s cup was laid in front of the entrance of the above convenience store; and (c) Macju’s speaking in front of the toilet, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s convenience store business by force by avoiding disturbance, such as a person who was locked in front of the entrance of the above convenience store.

B. From August 16:30 to 16:50, the Defendant, under the influence of alcohol, was unable to enter the victim’s convenience store business by forcing the customers, who were entering the said convenience store, such as putting the said victim “in and leaving the room,” and taking a bath without any justifiable reason, thereby obstructing the victim’s convenience store business by force.

2. From July 14:00 to 14:05, the Defendant interfered with Franc tasks, the Defendant, under the influence of alcohol in the “F control point” operated by the victim G in Ischeon-si, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s breac tasks, thereby obstructing the victim’s breac tasks by having bread the disturbance, such as drunkly drinking from the “F control point” operated by the victim G in Ischeon-si, making the victim take a bath while drinking, changing water so that he can drink, and making the breacate, making the breacs in the said breac tasks run, or preventing the customers who were entering the said b

3. H sand or interference with business;

A. On August 18, 2015, from around 06:00 to 07:00, the Defendant, under the influence of force, caused the disturbance by socing the spawn, by sobing the spawn while under the influence of alcohol from Hari or “man,” operated by the victim I, the victim I.