Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 12 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On April 15, 2015, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 4 million as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (driving in Drinking) in support of the Sungnam branch of Suwon Friwon.

[2] On September 22, 2020, the Defendant driven an EN city G80 vehicle within a section of approximately one kilometer to the front road in front of a mutual influent cafeteria located in the wife population B, while under the influence of alcohol by 0.171% during blood transfusion around 22:40.

Accordingly, the Defendant violated the prohibition of drinking alcohol driving more than twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the circumstances of the driver involved in driving;

1. Notification of the results of regulating drinking driving;

1. A written appraisal;

1. Previous conviction: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to inquiries about criminal history, investigation reports (a copy of the previous order and a copy of the summary order), and summary order;

1. Article 148-2 (1) and Article 44-2 (1) of the Road Traffic Act and the selection of fines concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, even though the defendant had been punished once due to drinking alcohol driving, the fact that the defendant has a high alcohol concentration in blood, etc. is disadvantageous to the defendant. Meanwhile, the defendant acknowledged the crime and is in a serious violation of the truth, the defendant does not have any traffic accident, the above drinking driver's previous conviction is a fine, and there are no particular criminal records, and the fact that the economic situation is not good, shall be considered as favorable to the defendant, and all other sentencing conditions stated in the records of this case shall be considered in light of the circumstances favorable to the defendant.