logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2021.01.21 2020고단6435
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 11 million.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Power of crime] On March 13, 2009, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 1.5 million as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (dacting driving) in the support of the Suwon Frigwon method.

[Criminal facts] On September 5, 2020, the Defendant driven a Dexton sports vehicle at approximately 2 km prior to C in the middle of B B in the middle of C in the middle of C in the middle of C in the middle of C in the middle of C in the middle of C.

Accordingly, the defendant violated the prohibition of drinking alcohol driving regulations not less than twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the circumstances of the driver involved in driving;

1. Notification of the results of regulating drinking driving;

1. Previous convictions: Inquiries about criminal history and the application of Acts and subordinate statutes of investigation reports (Attachment of materials related to criminal history);

1. Article 148-2 (1) and Article 44-2 (1) of the Road Traffic Act and the selection of fines concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act include: (a) the Defendant committed a second offense despite the fact that the Defendant had been punished once due to drinking alcohol driving; and (b) the fact that the blood alcohol concentration level is high; (c) on the other hand, the Defendant recognizes and reflects the Defendant’s crime; (d) the Defendant does not have any traffic accident; and (e) the above drinking driving criminal record is the criminal record of a fine in 2009; and (e) the fact that there is no particular criminal record, etc. are considered as favorable to the Defendant; and (e) the judgment is rendered as per the disposition by taking into account all other factors of

arrow