logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2021.02.04 2020고단6931
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 12 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Power of crime] On May 29, 2009, the Defendant was issued a summary order of a fine of two million won for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act at the Suwon Friwon.

[2] On September 2, 2020, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol level of 0.159% during blood transfusion around Sep. 2, 2020, and driven an EG80 car owned by D Co., Ltd. in the area of approximately 4km in the vicinity of the return village that is located in the cafeteria, in the vicinity of the return village that is located in the cafeteria, in the vicinity of the cafeteria.

Accordingly, the Defendant violated the prohibition of drinking alcohol driving more than twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the circumstances of the driver involved in driving;

1. Notification of the results of regulating drinking driving;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Inquiry about criminal history and application of Acts and subordinate statutes of investigation report (verification of the same kind of force);

1. Article 148-2 (1) and Article 44-2 (1) of the Road Traffic Act and the selection of fines concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, even though the defendant had been punished twice due to drinking alcohol driving, and the fact that the blood alcohol concentration level is high, etc. are disadvantageous to the defendant. Meanwhile, the defendant is recognized and seriously against the defendant, the defendant does not have any traffic accident, and the above drinking driving criminal is a long-term fine, and the fact that there is no criminal record is no criminal record, etc. are considered as favorable to the defendant. It is so decided as per Disposition in full view of all other sentencing conditions stated in the records of this case.

arrow