logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2018.7.12.선고 2017도16545 판결
부정경쟁방지및영업비밀보호에관환법률위반(영업비밀누설등),업무상배임
Cases

2017Do16545 A. Violation of the Unfair Competition Prevention and Trade Secret Protection Act (Disclosure of Business Secrets, etc.)

B. Occupational breach of trust

Defendant

1. A. B.

2.(a) B

3. A. CO (Co., Ltd. before the change: C);

Appellant

Defendant A and Prosecutor

The judgment below

Incheon District Court Decision 2013No3165 Decided September 21, 2017

Imposition of Judgment

July 12, 2018

Text

All appeals are dismissed.

Reasons

The grounds of appeal are examined.

The lower court found Defendant A guilty of all the facts charged (excluding the part on acquittal in the grounds of appeal) and acquitted Defendant B and Defendant CO on the grounds that there was no evidence to prove the facts charged. Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment in light of the evidence duly admitted, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the relevant legal doctrine, without exhaust all necessary deliberations, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal. The grounds of appeal by Defendant A and the Prosecutor are dismissed in its entirety without merit.

Judges

Justices Kim Jae-sik et al.

Justices Cho Jong-hee

Justices Kim Jae-sik in charge

Justices Min Min-young

arrow