logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2018.11.15 2017나53801
소유권말소등기
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation of this case is as follows: (a) the court of first instance rejected the result of the commission of the medical record appraisal to an ordinary university hospital which is insufficient to recognize the Plaintiff’s assertion; and (b) the same applies to the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance, except that the court of first instance deemed “No. 22, 2015” as “No. 5, Apr. 22, 2005” as “No. 22, 2005.” Therefore, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow