1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

[Claim]

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows: (a) the evidence submitted additionally by this court, which is insufficient to admit the defendant's assertion, and the statement of evidence Nos. 6 through 13 is rejected; and (b) the part of the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the corresponding part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the dismissal of part of the judgment of the court of first instance as stated below "2. height".

2. On the 5th page 5th page 13 to 15th page of the first instance judgment, the part stating that “If the result of the sewage analysis shows good results, the sample sample requested for the analysis shall be submitted as evidence, but it shall not be submitted,” as follows.

According to the result of the appraisal commission with respect to appraiser F of this Court, the primary ingredients that cannot find the cause through the analysis of the general error ingredients are the cause of engine height. However, the result of the above error analysis alone can not be ruled out entirely the possibility of leapability." Considering the fact that the possibility of luxing in the last line below the last line below the 5th column of the first instance judgment, “The possibility is low, and the luxing in the lux lux 3 cost of assistive engines No. C1, 2, and 3 was removed from the engine room before May 2009, the court determined that the engine accident was highly likely to occur due to the defect in the inside operation of the auxiliary engine without the lubing pumps pumps and insufficient supply of lubrication.”

"Determination that the possibility is low."

3. The judgment of the court of first instance is justifiable, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.