logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.11.11 2016나1177
임금
Text

1. The appeal by plaintiffs BH and BI and the defendant's appeal are dismissed, respectively.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by each appellant.

3...

Reasons

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation as to this case is partly amended as set forth in the following 2. The defendant’s argument raised in the trial of the court of first instance is as stated in the part concerning the plaintiffs and the defendant in the judgment of the court of first instance, except for further determination in the following 3. Thus, this is accepted in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure

2. The amended portion “written “pre-paid” at the 3rd lower end of the judgment of the first instance court at the 15th end shall be amended to read “written “pre-paid (pre-paid)” and “not later than June 30, 201” as “not later than June 30, 201.”

11. The portion of the 19th decision of the first instance court that paid in installments every month an amount of at least 250% of the base annual salary of the EA Enforcement Rule of the Rules of Employment shall be revised as follows only for patrols (elections, promotions, and assistants) who are in office as of the payment date in accordance with the payment criteria separately set by the president in accordance with the payment criteria separately set by the president.

The 15th line "from December 2010 to December 12, 2010" at the bottom of the 19th judgment of the court of first instance shall be amended to "from March 201 to "from March 8, 2010", the 8th line "Ber Nos. 1 through 5, 7, 8, 13, and 14" at the bottom of the same 19th line to "Ber Nos. 1 through 5, 7, 8, 13, and 14", respectively, and

The “each of the instant allowances, etc.” at the bottom of the 21th judgment of the first instance court shall be “instant allowances, etc.”, and the “2010, 2011, and 2012” at the bottom of the same 7th judgment shall be amended to “2010, 2011, and 2013” at the bottom of the same 21th judgment, and the “one of the above periods” at the bottom of the same 21th judgment shall be deleted.

“The method of differential payment to the Plaintiffs from March 201 to March 201 according to the actual number of working days and duties” of the first instance court’s 22 pages 7 and 8 shall be revised to “the method of changing the method of payment, such as payment of a monthly amount from January 201 to the Plaintiffs, and differential payment according to the actual number of working days and duties.”

The decision of the first instance is 23 pages.

arrow