The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

1. The summary of the facts charged is a person who actually operates D sirens, E is a person who worked in D sirens, and F is a former G employee.

F On July 14, 2012, around 17:30 on the 17:30 of the Gyeongnam-si, F: (a) at the Ge-si Gyeongnam-si, H opened a door-to-door Dok-to-face (hereinafter referred to as “instant vehicle”) vehicle with a long-term siren from D Deren E, and did not look at the subsequent objects, and the door was then sucked back and damaged.

As F is unable to cope with the repair cost of KRW 15 million, the Defendant, F and the instant vehicle owner: (a) obtained the instant vehicle from a personal vehicle of F to receive an accident from the insurance company as if the accident occurred; and (b) conspired to receive the repair cost.

F The F was in the J of Masan-gu, Jeonju-si on July 17, 2012

On July 14, 2012, at the G office, the instant vehicle parked in the G K EX-related K K EX-related truck operated by himself/herself by telephone, and received an accident of false knowledge that the instant vehicle was blicked and flicked, and the door was flicked, and that the vehicle was flicked. On August 3, 2012, 200, the Defendant, the representative of D Dorenk, received the repair cost of KRW 15 million from the Defendant’s mother L’s account (M) account, which is the representative of D Dorenk, to receive the repair cost.

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The Defendant and the defense counsel asserted that the instant vehicle was a so-called Drenk, and the instant vehicle was damaged by F due to the mistake of F, and that F would have been an insurance handling and damage, such as repair costs, and subsequently, the Defendant and the instant vehicle was transferred KRW 15 million from the insurance company, but did not procure insurance money through the receipt of an accident of F, E, and false facts, and did not participate in the execution of the instant vehicle.

B. 1) According to the evidence adopted and examined by this Court, the following facts can be acknowledged:

(1)