logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2016.08.10 2016고정609
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동주거침입)
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

Defendant

If A does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Around February 2010, Around the same year, A entered into a management-based contract with the purport that “A non-performing Housing Management Co., Ltd.” (the trade name at the time shall be the representative of the KYA) and the officetel shall be three years from March 1, 2010 to February 28, 2013, and the term of the contract shall be extended to three years if there is no particular notification to the Young-gu Council, and the term of the contract shall be extended to three years if there is no specific notification to the Young-gu Council.” The above management-level contract was extended by February 28, 2013, and the above management-level contract was not notified of the termination of the above management-level contract.

Nevertheless, on August 11, 2015, Defendant A entered into a contract for the management of the said officetel B and the said officetel with the term of contract from September 1, 2015 to September 2, 2015.

Then, the FF on August 12, 2015

8. At the time of 26.26. A request was made to the B B B B-house management to “the above Officetel management”, and the K B-house management side sent to the F a certificate that “the F-house management contract with the F-related company cannot be recognized, which prevents the management work on the ground that the instant Office is a legitimate management company,” and there was a dispute between the two companies regarding the management of the said Office, such as sending a reply again from the F.

In such a situation, B, Defendant A, at the time, had the victim G, who is the non-housing management staff of the case, forcedly opened the office of the above officetel management office that he properly manages, and had the victim receive the management work from the victim.

Accordingly, the defendant B and the defendant A found that the head of the management office has a correction device at around September 1, 2015 at the above officetels management office around 09:50.

arrow