(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.04.22 2014고단7851

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.04.22 2014고단7851

상해

Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, 100.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. At around 01:50 on July 16, 2014, Defendant A committed assault to the victim B (the age 26) (the age 26) of the F convenience store located in Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, without any special reason, in order to have the victim B (the age 26) walked “Ye franchise” one time, the victim’s left face is hye, the victim’s face is hye, the victim’s face is hye by hand, the victim’s face is hye, and the victim was hyeed with both hand, and the victim was hyeed with the victim’s face. In short, Defendant A inflicted an injury on the victim, such as multiple character impairment that requires treatment for three weeks.

2. Defendant B, at the time, at the time, and place specified in paragraph (1), committed assault, such as the victim A (the age of 48), having the face of the victim one time by drinking, and pushing the victim with two descendants, thereby inflicting an injury upon the victim, such as the breathing of the arctal s that require approximately eight weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

[Fact 1]

1. Defendant A’s legal statement

1. Legal statement of witness B and G;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. B photograph of the suspect (the fact of Article 2 at the time of display);

1. Defendant B’s partial statement

1. Legal statement of witness A and G;

1. Protocol concerning the examination of suspect B by the prosecution;

1. First time protocol concerning suspect suspect A;

1. Medical certificate (A)

1. A suspect A photograph;

1. Defendant B asserts that the investigation report (related to the transfer of a suspect hospital) is not due to the Defendant’s assault, but to the extent that the Defendant’s act constitutes self-defense, as it is aimed at setting up against the Defendant’s assault, and that the Defendant’s act constitutes self-defense.

However, according to evidence, it is recognized that the injury of the victim at cages, sages, and spelfs, suffered by the victim, was caused in the course of the dispute with the defendant. In light of the defendant's assault and the degree of injury to the victim A, it is determined that the defendant's act does not constitute a case where there is considerable reason to defend the present unfair infringement of his legal interests

유사 판례

-대전지방법원 2020.01.22 2019고단1399

-광주지방법원 순천지원 2015.04.22 2014고단1447

-대구지방법원 서부지원 2019.02.27 2018고단839

-인천지방법원 2017.06.07 2017고단1414

-대전지방법원 천안지원 2015.07.09 2015고단461