logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2013.10.24 2013고정4517
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 7,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a person who operates a sexual traffic business establishment under the trade name of "D massage treatment establishment" at the 3 and 4th floor of Gwanak-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, and the defendant B is a worker who has engaged in business such as water dys, etc. in the carter in the above business establishment.

1. Defendant A conspired with employees of B, E, etc. from August 6, 2012 to February 26, 2013, the Defendant paid 80,000 won out of the amount paid by customers per 190,000 won to F (one female employee G), H (one person), J (one person), L (one person), and L (one person M) in collusion with the said female employees to make a sexual intercourse with an unspecified customer.

On February 26, 2013, after the Defendant was under control at the Seoul Mak Police Station due to the above criminal facts, the Defendant suspended his/her business at a temporarily, but in collusion with employees of N,O, P, etc., from March 2, 2013 to June 5, 2013, the Defendant paid 80,000 won out of the money paid by customers to Q, etc. at the above business establishment, and caused the said female employees to provide a sexual intercourse with an unspecified customer.

Accordingly, the Defendant conspiredd with B, E, etc. from August 6, 2012 to February 26, 2013, and arranged commercial sex acts for business from March 3, 2013 to June 02:00.

2. From January 2013 to February 26, 201:50, Defendant B conspired with the said business establishment from January 2013 to February 26, 2013 to pay 80,000 won out of the amount paid by customers 1.90,000 won per person to F (one female employee G), H (one day name I), J (one name K), L (one name M) and the said female employees conspired with the said female employees to have sexual intercourse with the said unspecified customers, thereby arranging sexual traffic.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police interrogation protocol on Defendants and J, F, T, H, L, E, S, Q, N,O, and P

1. A copy of a daily account book;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant Articles of the Act concerning the facts constituting the crime;

arrow