A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On April 10, 2016, around 22:50, the Defendant came to enter the main place under the influence of alcohol at the D main points located in Speaker-si C around 22:50, and the Defendant was unable to set the entrance door of the main place of business.

In addition, the defendant was unable to avoid disturbance, such as flabing flabing, flabing, parking-prohibited signboards, etc., which were located near the above main point, toward the entrance of the said main point, and flabing off to E who want to enter the said main point.

At around 23:00 on the same day, the Defendant filed a report with G, etc. belonging to F District under the F District of F District upon receiving a report of 112 on the said disturbance at around 23:00, and filed a report with G, etc. on behalf of the Defendant, who is under his/her custody at hand, and followed the report to F District of F District, etc., and, at the same time, waiting for the Defendant, who was under his/her control, “A police officers

It is possible to cope with this problem.

“A bath,” such as “,” was made.

The Defendant continued to take a bath to the police officer who was called out, and committed assault, such as the Plaintiff’s bucks and bucks, by putting the said G into a part of the G, and selling the face of the said G, and continuously putting the upper part of the bucks and bucks.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement concerning G in the police statement protocol;

1. Statement of H;

1. Application of each video statute of photograph and CD;

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (amended by Act No.62(1) of the suspended sentence (amended by Presidential Decree No.1 of the following sentencing grounds) is [the scope of applicable sentences] imprisonment with prison labor for not more than five years [the type of decision] [the scope of recommended sentences] basic area of interference with the performance of official duties among the groups of crimes that interfere with the performance of official duties [the scope of recommended sentences], from six months to one year and four months [the ruling of sentence] under the suspended sentence, assaulting a police in uniform of two years from the suspended sentence for six months