beta
Text
1. The Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) executed to the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) from December 12, 201 to December 17, 2011.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. (1) The Defendant was hospitalized in C Hospital on December 13, 201, and was diagnosed with a certificate of escape of a conical signboard No. 6-7 on the right side of December 14, 201, and received a diagnosis from the Plaintiff, who was a doctor working at the instant hospital, for the implementation of the instant surgery and the occurrence of sexual horses (hereinafter “instant surgery”).
(2) 이 사건 수술이 끝난 후 피고는 2011. 12. 16.경부터 목소리가 정상적으로 나오지 않고 쉰 목소리(이하 ‘이 사건 장해’라 한다)만 나오게 되었다.
B. (1) On December 17, 201, the Defendant was discharged from C Hospital on December 17, 201, and received a medical examination on December 20, 201 in order to find out the cause of the instant disability and to find out the cause thereof, and received a medical examination from DB’s post. From December 22, 2011 to December 31, 201, the Defendant was hospitalized in the Indonesian University Hospital.
(2) After January 16, 2012, the Defendant was hospitalized in the Synish University Synish Hospital, received sexual injecting surgery on the same day, and was discharged from the hospital on the same day, and received outpatient treatment until April 2012. The voice was recovered normally at that time.
[Ground of recognition] A without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3 (including branch numbers, if any; hereinafter the same shall apply), Eul evidence Nos. 1 through 10, and 14, the result of the fact inquiry into D non-humanarology of this court, the result of the examination of medical records entrustment to the KaTol University Non-Atholo Hospital, the purport of the whole pleadings
2. Occurrence of liability for damages;
A. (1) The plaintiff's assertion (1) The plaintiff explained to the defendant about the side effects, etc. of the alcohol of this case before conducting the instant surgery, and the harm suffered by the defendant was caused by no negligence on the plaintiff, and there was no negligence on the part of the plaintiff.
(2) The defendant's argument that the defendant suffered is a disability.