1. The plaintiff's respective claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. On July 14, 201, the Plaintiff was diagnosed by the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital No. 4-5 of the Nali Medical Center (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”) at the hospital operated by the Defendant Medical Corporation (hereinafter “Defendant Medical Foundation”) (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”) due to the pain and the left-hand symptoms, etc.

B. On July 15, 2011, at around 08:18, the Plaintiff aggravated the pain and the left-hand side, and was hospitalized in the Defendant Hospital to undergo the same diagnosis, and to conduct an operation, the Plaintiff was hospitalized in the Defendant Hospital. On the same day, the Defendant B, who is a physician of the Defendant Hospital, was in charge of an unsatisfecule hye hye hye hye hye hye hye (hereinafter “instant 1 operation”).

C. After the instant first surgery, the Plaintiff complained of pains on the left-hand side of the Defendant hospital, the 1st unit of the 1st unit of the 1st unit of the hospital, and the decline in the sense of view. On July 19, 201, the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital inspected the RoI on the RoI on the 19th unit of the surgery and observed the recurrence of the lag escape certificate on the same day, the Plaintiff was undergoing a re-operation from the Defendant B (hereinafter “instant 2 surgery”).

After the second operation of this case, the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital re-examineed the MRI test on August 12, 201, and the outcome of the recurrence of the symptoms from the operation was observed.

Therefore, although the medical personnel of Defendant Hospital including Defendant B proposed the third surgery to the Plaintiff, the Plaintiff refused to do so and discharged the Plaintiff on the 22th of the same month.

E. On August 24, 201, the Plaintiff was immediately hospitalized in the Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D Hospital, and was subject to the front and rear hydronuclear removal and the engine fixed method (e.g., e., vertegrative convergence between spine and bagical fixed method) at the above hospital as of August 24, 201. On February 25, 2012, the Plaintiff was under the examination of physical disability in relation to the escape from the post-signed signboard at the above hospital No. 4-5.

[Ground of recognition] A.