1. The Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) paid KRW 12,00,000 to the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) as well as to the amount from January 6, 2011 to February 2, 2016.

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendant is a medical corporation that operates the Dongjak-hee Hospital (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”).

B. The Plaintiff is a patient who was hospitalized in the Defendant Hospital from November 22, 2010 to April 25, 201, due to a traffic accident around November 20, 201, and undergone an operation on the right-free and kne-free kne-free side by twice from the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital.

C. In other words, around December 6, 2010, the medical professionals of the Defendant Hospital performed the Plaintiff, and around December 6, 201, the Defendant Hospital performed the Defendant-based knee-defekne-defekne-defekne-defekne-defeng-defekne-defekne-defe

(hereinafter referred to as the “instant surgery”) d.e., the left-hand knee-free kne-free knee-free knee-free kne-free kne-free knee-free

The non-party Samsung Marine Insurance Co., Ltd., an insurance company obligated to pay insurance money equivalent to the medical expenses incurred in the instant traffic accident (hereinafter “Ssung Fire”), upon the request of the Defendant hospital, filed a request with the Medical Fee Dispute Resolution Council (hereinafter “Council”) under the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act for an examination of the entire medical expenses including the instant medical expenses related to the instant operation. On September 29, 2011, the Council rendered a decision on the instant part concerning the underwater alcohol (hereinafter “the instant surgery was performed with the slurf certificate, but the operation was conducted with the slurf certificate, and submitted, referring to the slurfI, and the slurfist at the left-hand Slurf in the face of the Defendant hospital, but the form of the operation is maintained, and the operation was not proper due to the lack of srurfies and acute damage to the nature of the Plaintiff’s medical expenses.” The Council decided that the instant operation should be returned to Defendant hospital.

(On the other hand, the defendant did not object to the above decision and the above decision became final and conclusive).

According to the above decision of the Council, the defendant hospital is related to the instant surgery among medical expenses which the defendant hospital did not receive from Samsung Fire (the plaintiff is extremely extreme).