logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 공주지원 2019.01.11 2018고단305
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four years.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Around May 4, 2018, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “A person who works for an elevator repair business,” the Defendant would return the elevator construction work plus 10% of the principal and investment expenses until May 26, 2018, to the victim B, prior to the mutual infinite convenience store located in the new-dong, Sinju City, and that “A person who makes an investment shall return the elevator construction work by May 26, 2018.”

However, at the time of the Internet gambling, the Defendant had no intention or ability to repay the amount to the victim even if he/she borrowed money from the victim, as he/she was planned to do so with the money borrowed from the victim, and thus, he/she did not have any intention or ability to do so.

Nevertheless, the Defendant deceiving the victim as above and received KRW 9,00,000 from the victim’s account under the name of the Defendant on the same day. From August 30, 2017 to May 31, 2018, the Defendant revised the sum of the charges of KRW 313,430,00 in total from ten victims, such as the list of crimes in attached Form 10, to KRW 313,450,00 in total. However, as seen thereafter, the sum of the charges of KRW 313,450,00 in total, was 313,450,00 in total.

was issued by the Corporation.

"2018 Highest 492"

1. On April 21, 2017, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant would immediately return the loan upon retirement.” at the time of retirement, at the F office operated by E, a victim, the victim of which is the victim of the Cheongju-si, which is operated by E, the considerable amount of the Cheongju-si, the Defendant applied for the loan to the victim through an employee in the name-free manner. In doing so, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant would pay KRW 300,000 from each monthly salary.”

However, in fact, the Defendant thought that most of the loans would be raised as gambling funds on a one-half-day basis, and there was no specific means to repay the loans other than monthly allowances because there was no assets, and there was no intention to serve in the victim until he fully pays the above funds.

arrow