logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2017.05.26 2017고단728
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On July 2016, when the Defendant was in need of money to engage in online card gambling, the Defendant: (a) applied for a loan by accessing the victim’s Hyundai Capital Stock Company’s Internet homepage from Seopo-si B residence on July 27, 2016; (b) subsequently, the Defendant made telephone conversations with the counselor and made telephone conversations as if he/she would be able to fully repay the loan to the counselor; and (c) then, the Defendant’s signature and seal with the victim company:

7. 28. 28. A personal credit loan agreement was concluded on July 28, 2016 to October 28, 2019, and on the terms of repayment of KRW 1,191,208 each month after the three months of a grace period, on the terms of repayment of KRW 1,208.

However, in fact, the defendant did not have an intention or ability to repay the loan properly because he did not have any other property including the deposit, and he thought that the loan would be used in the Internet card gambling with a high possibility of high possibility of making the loan due to an individual taxi driver.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, like the terms of a loan contract, took place as if he were to repay the principal and interest of the loan to the victim company, and deceiving the victim company, which was subject to this, received 30 million won of the loan from the victim company on July 28, 2016 from the victim company to the Agricultural Cooperative Account (C) in the name of the Defendant, and acquired it by fraud.

2. On February 23, 2017, the Defendant: (a) was summoned as a person suspected of having committed such fraud as described in the preceding paragraph at around 10:10 on February 23, 2017; and (b) was summoned to the police station investigation 1 and D team office at Seopopopo City 27 prudent; and (c) was waiting for the Defendant’s investigation, the Defendant, a police officer in charge, who was waiting at the place for the Defendant’s investigation, “I will be subject to an investigation of why he was

Dogld's care for the head of the party, Dogl's d, d, d, is a fraud;

In this context, we cannot say "to throw away," and keep records of investigation documents on the E's book, keep computer monitors in hand, and collect keyboard E.

arrow