beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
1..
Reasons
1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the court of first instance is as follows, and thus, it is consistent with the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, by Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act
The last part of the third parallel shall be referred to as the "the defendant" to the head of Gangnam-gu.
Type 6
2.(a)
1) The part of paragraph (1) (Articles 6 through 13, 13, 7, and 3) is deleted (the part for which this part of the claim was partially accepted in the first instance trial, but the part for which the notice of imposition of indemnity and late payment charge stated in the table Nos. 1 and 1-1, 1-1, 2 of the disposition of imposition of indemnity and late payment charge stated in the table Nos. 1 and 2 of the table Nos. 1-1, 1-1, and 4 of the table Nos. 1-1, 1-1, and the part for which the plaintiff and
[] Paragraph 2 of Part 7 is referred to as "(1)" and Paragraph 3 of Part 4 is referred to as "paragraph 2 of Part 7 is referred to as "paragraph 1", and Paragraph 2 of Part 9(c) is referred to as "paragraph 9(3) at the bottom and Paragraph 3 is referred to as "2." The part of part 9(d)(10) is deleted, the part of the 10th part is referred to as "(c)", the part of the 18th part is referred to as "(d)." The part of the 12th part is referred to as "(e)", and the part of the 15-18th part is referred to as "(2)", and the part of the 11th part is referred to as "(d)."
2) The building ledger (Evidence No. 1-2) on the building of this case stated that the approval date for use of the building of this case was June 1, 197. However, since the Act on Special Measures for Arrangement of Specific Buildings was first enacted on December 31, 1981 and was enforced on December 31, 1981, it cannot be deemed that the certificate of completion inspection was issued in accordance with the procedure stipulated in the above Act and was registered in the building ledger. Accordingly, the entry of the building ledger of this case alone is the state on the site of this case.