1. Each claim and trial of Plaintiff A, B, C, and F, which were changed in exchange for the appeal and trial of Plaintiff D, respectively, are added.

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation as to this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for cases of dismissal or addition as set forth in the following paragraph (2). Thus, this is accepted in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The part used or added by the court of first instance shall be subject to the following measures: (a) “Plaintiff A” through “I” in Part 14 of the judgment of first instance shall be null and void:

The notice of the remaining retirement from office against the plaintiffs is null and void. Accordingly, the defendant is obligated to pay the money stated in the purport of the claim, which is equivalent to the unpaid wage, to the plaintiff A, B, C, and F, and the plaintiff D and the defendant seek confirmation of the retirement age date and the invalidity of the notice of the retirement from office on June 22, 2016. The plaintiff D and the defendant shall seek confirmation of the invalidity of the notice of the remaining retirement from office on June 22, 2016. The plaintiff deleted the 7th judgment of the first instance and the 18th judgment of the 9th judgment "C." and the 18th judgment of the 18th judgment "C." and the 20th judgment of the 1

The 12th through 6th of the first instance judgment shall be followed as follows.

The fact that the Defendant, on January 1, 2016, employed 10 new reserve officers as contract workers on January 1, 2016, transferred all of them to regular workers on April 1, 2016, and issued personnel management, can be recognized by the entry of the evidence No. 3-2, either as a dispute between the parties or as a result.

However, according to the scale of the workplace, Article 19 of the Elderly Employment Act is enforced from January 1, 2016 to the business or workplace with at least 300 full-time workers, and the enforcement date of the Act is suspended for less than 300 full-time workers.

If so, whether a business or a place of business is subject to the above provision from January 1, 2016 to the subject of the above provision, or is subject to the further postponement of one year from the enforcement date of the above provision, at least before January 1, 2016, the first enforcement date of Article 19 of the Elderly Employment Act.