logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2015.08.20 2015고단1668
주민등록법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Criminal facts

1. On April 7, 2015, the Defendant violated the Resident Registration Act: (a) around 23:15, the Defendant was subject to a drinking test following the reaction of a drinking-free machine from E by the superintendent of the police station belonging to the Kim Young Sea Police Station in charge of the traffic control of drinking driving.

As above, the Defendant was asked by the horse E about his personal information in the course of taking a sobage measurement, and said D’s resident registration number, which was known to ordinary people without any authority, was used unlawfully by using another person’s resident registration number.

2. Forgery of private documents;

A. On April 8, 2015, around 00:10, the Defendant, at the office in charge of the traffic accident investigation of the Kimhae-dong, Kim Young-dong, Kim Young-dong, Kim Young-si, as seen above, took place as D, and the notification was taken as a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving) and as such, the notification was discovered, and the Defendant stated “D” in the column for confirmation of the report on the discovery of the location of the designated person E, which was presented by the police officer E, and posted it to the name.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising a certificate, the Defendant forged a letter of confirmation of the name, person who notified the name, and the location discovery report.

B. The Defendant stated “D” as “D” in the column, which is the horse promise for the investigation of the instant case presented by the Speaker E at the time, location, and the name subsequent thereto.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising a certificate of fact, the Defendant forged the column, which is the promise of appearance to investigate the case in the name of D.

3. The Defendant, at the time, and at the place under Paragraph 2, delivered the forged documents to the Gyeong, who was aware of the forgery, as if they were the document duly formed.

4. Forgery of private signature;

A. On April 8, 2015, the Defendant is the suspect of the violation of the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving) from the slopeF at the office of the traffic accident investigation department of the Kimhae Police Station on April 8, 2015.

arrow