Text
1. B on December 21, 2013, entry No. 1 to B in the column of “net No. 3” in the separate sheet relating to an accident that died during the operation of the Ototoba.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
(a) The relationship B between the parties is D and 21 December 2013, 2013:
The accident considered in the subsection was killed.
As a parent of B, the appointed party C and the defendant inherited B's inherited property as one-half shares of each statutory inheritance.
B. The Defendant concluded each of the instant insurance contracts with the Plaintiff as the policyholder, insured B, and beneficiary statutory heir of the death insurance money, with the agreement of the Defendant and the designated parties C, and concluded each of the insurance contracts listed in the “net No.” column in the attached Table No. 1 through 4, with the agreement of the Defendant and the designated parties. B entered into an insurance contract with the Plaintiff on September 30, 2013 as the policyholder, insured B, and beneficiary statutory heir of the death insurance money, as indicated in the “net No. 5” column in the attached Table No. 5.
(3) At the time of entering into the instant first insurance contract, the Plaintiff’s insurance planners E at the time of entering into the instant first insurance contract, and the Plaintiff’s insurance planners at the time of entering into the instant second or fifth insurance contract. (c) The developments leading up to the instant accident are the Defendant. B around December 20, 2013, around 21:15, the FOba (hereinafter “the instant Obaba”).
2) On December 21, 2013, while driving a motor vehicle and driving a motor vehicle in the direction of the second line in front of the erroneous parking lot located in Guro-gu Seoul, Guro-gu, Seoul and driving a motor vehicle in the direction of the city in the direction of the city in the direction of the city in the direction of the city in the direction of the city in the direction of the city in the direction of the city in the direction of the city in the direction of the city in the direction of the city in the direction of the city in the direction of the city in the direction of the city in the direction of the city in the direction of the city in the direction of the city in the direction of the city in the direction of the city in the direction of the city in the direction of the city in the direction of the accident in the direction of the city in the direction of the city in the direction of the
2. Determination as to the claim on the principal lawsuit
A. The gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion 1 Each insurance contract of this case is the death of B as an insured event.
This case No. 1.