logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2016.01.20 2015고단1277
폭행등
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

The Defendants did not pay the above fines.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

A. On May 24, 2015, the Defendant committed assault against the victim by hand on the ground that the victim D (16 years of age) was satisfy in the victim D (the 16 years of age) in the case of Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si, 2015, 20:56 No. 28, 38, 18, 18, 200, and 16, 2015.

B. On May 24, 2015, at around 21:10, the Defendant: (a) requested a victim F (49 tax) who is the police officer belonging to the police unit E District in the Cheongju District Police Station, the police officer belonging to the E District Police Station, to voluntarily accompany the said district, and (b) made it difficult for other persons to move together with the victim of the patrol lane, and (c) made one time the victim faces the victim's face at one time.

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in criminal investigations, and at the same time, the victim was faced with the inside and outside of the inside and outside of the safe-time care for about two weeks.

2. Defendant B, at the time, at the place specified in the above paragraph 1-b, reported that Defendant B arrested Defendant B as a police officer F belonging to the Cheongju Police Station E District Police Station E District, and Defendant B as a flagrant offender who interfered with the performance of official duties, Defendant B, by hand, committed assault, such as plucking and plucking the body of the above F, and cutting the arms of the above G, to take the arms against A.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the arrest of police officers in the act of committing a crime.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each legal statement of witness D, F and G;

1. Part of the protocol concerning the interrogation of suspects against Defendant A by the prosecution

1. Each police statement made in relation to D, F and G;

1. Each statement of H and I prepared;

1. The CD videos, photographs, and diagnostic notes (the defense counsel of the defendant A) are refusing voluntary accompanying of the police officer at the time and place specified in paragraph 1 of the judgment of the above defendant in response to the police officer's voluntary accompanying demand and attaching them to the victim F who is a police officer.

arrow