Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

On December 13, 2016, the Defendant: (a) was spiting tobacco at the patrol vehicle and moved to the back seat of the patrol vehicle by the police officer belonging to the police station in the Cheongju-gu Police Station C, who was called out after receiving a report that the ju was used from the ju-gu, Cheongju-gu, the Dong-gu, the Dong-gu, the Dong-gu, the Dong-gu, the Dong-gu, the Dong-gu, the Dong-gu, the Dong-gu, the Dong-gu, the Dong-gu, the Dong-gu, the Dong-gu, the Dong-gu, the Dong-gu, the Dong-gu, the Dong-gu, the Dong-gu, the Dong-gu, the Dong-gu, the Dong-gu, the Dong-gu, the Dong-gu, was spiting the spit of the D's shoulder on the back seat of the Dong-gu, the Defendant was spited at the front seat of the D's seat, and the circumstances leading up to the Defendant's escape.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the handling of 112 reported cases, and the prevention and suppression of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement (as at the date of the second public trial, in the case);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to D, E, and F;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act prevents the Defendant from performing official duties by assaulting police officers on duty. The fact that the degree of assault is not less than that of the Defendant is disadvantageous to the Defendant, the fact that the Defendant led to the confession of the instant crime, against whom the Defendant was committed, and that there was no criminal record is favorable to the Defendant.

In addition to the above circumstances, all the sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments of this case shall be determined as per the disposition.