1. The judgment of the first instance court, including any addition and amendment claims, shall be modified as follows:

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, such as accepting the judgment of the court of first instance, is as follows 2. The relevant part of the judgment of the court of first instance is modified as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance (excluding the part of “4. conclusion”) except for supplementing or adding the judgment as stated in the following 3. Thus, it is acceptable in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence

2. On the right side of the 5th side of the amendment, “Sable land” is marked, and when J land through Q land is called “Sable land”, the 6th side of the 6th parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel with the 6th side of the Defendant’s Intervenor’s Intervenor’s Intervenor’s Intervenor’s Intervenor’s Intervenor’s Intervenor’s Intervenor’s Intervenor’s Intervenor’s Intervenor’s Intervenor’s Intervenor’s Intervenor’s Intervenor’s Intervenor’s Intervenor’s Intervenor’s appeal is not an administrative appeal, but a civil petition is filed by the Plaintiff’s petitioner’s petitioner’s appeal petition. Thus, the Plaintiff’s appeal is not appropriate to be invoked as a separate factual basis.

However, the above Supreme Court decision is purporting to make a request for administrative appeal regardless of the agency which has submitted a document that a claimant submitted to relieve any disadvantage that the period of request expires due to lack of professional legal knowledge. Thus, even if the ruling agency was abolished due to the revision of the Administrative Appeals Act, it should be deemed that it can be invoked in this case.

In addition, even if the petition submitted by the plaintiff was prepared on the basis of counsel's advice, at the time when the plaintiff submitted the petition, the lawyer takes the disposition.