Defendant

A Imprisonment of 10 months, Defendant B’s imprisonment of 4 months, Defendant C’s imprisonment of 6 months and Defendant D’s imprisonment of 6 months.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal record] On October 16, 2009, Defendant C was sentenced to one year of imprisonment for a violation of the Game Industry Promotion Act by the Seoul Northern District Court on the grounds of violation of the Act on Promotion of Game Industry, and on August 13, 2010 during the execution of the sentence, Defendant C was provisionally released on August 7, 201.

【Criminal Facts】

Defendant

A paid KRW 10,00,000 as the business owner of the F Game site at the original week, and Defendant E provided a game machine as the joint business owner of the above game site, Defendant D and Defendant C managed the above game room, and Defendant B conspiredd to operate the above game room together with employees of the above game room.

Accordingly, Defendant A paid KRW 10 million for the lease deposit of the above game room, and Defendant E supplied 40 units for the above game room, Defendant D and Defendant C manage the overall business and employees of the above game room, and Defendant B from March 22, 2012 through the method of giving customers a coophone to customers by using the name of customers or giving customers a coophone at the cooter.

4. up to December, 12, using the USB in the above game room, 40 units of “sshber game” programed to “the creation of a separate map, the initialization and the occurrence of an event” were offered for customers’ use, and customers obtained the score through the game, issued a game coophone stating the score obtained when they obtain the score through the game, and then entered the game in the above game machine to the degree of the coophone’s score at the request of the customers so that customers can play the game again.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to provide game products with contents different from the contents of the rating classification and provided them with gambling and other speculative acts using game products, or forced them to do so.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A written statement of the G production;

1. Investigation report (the contents of alteration of a game machine), and a game description;

1. Seizure records;

1. On-site photographs;

1. A previous conviction in judgment: