logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2011.07.15 2011고합82
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(절도)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.

The number of seized drones (date No. 24), 1, 1,000,00 square meters (No. 25).

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On January 31, 2008, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes at the Jung-gu District Court on January 31, 2008, and on November 6, 2009, at the same court, sentenced one year and six months of imprisonment with prison labor for the same crime, and completed the execution of the sentence at the Chuncheon Prison on December 22, 2010.

Around 1:20 on May 16, 201, the Defendant habitually worn a stock farm site and opened and intruded with a small room installed by using the draber on the date, and thereafter, the Defendant: (a) two gold-packs in an amount equivalent to KRW 200,000, market price of KRW 300,000; (b) one half of gold-packs in an amount equivalent to KRW 1,00,000, market price of KRW 150,000; (c) one gold-packs in an amount equivalent to KRW 150,000, market price of KRW 2; (d) one gold-packs in an amount equivalent to KRW 5,000; (e) one gold-packs in an amount equivalent to KRW 1,50,000; (e) one gold-packs in an amount of KRW 5,00,000; and (e) one gold-packs in an amount of KRW 1, 6,5,50000,000.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol of the accused by prosecution;

1. Each police statement of E and D;

1. Seized articles, on-site photographs, and fingerprints and replies of the result of appraisal at the scene of crime;

1. Seizure records;

1. Previous records: Criminal records, investigation reports (Attachment to the same type of judgment), and suspect interrogation records of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Habituality of judgment: Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the larceny shall be recognized in view of the past records of each crime, the number of crimes, the number of crimes, and the repeated crimes of the same kind in the judgment;

1. Article 5-4 (6) and (1) of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, Article 329 of the Criminal Act, the choice of imprisonment for a limited term concerning the crime;

1. The proviso to Article 35 and the proviso to Article 42 of the Criminal Act among repeated offenders;

1. Discretionary mitigation Criminal Act;

arrow