logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2016.05.17 2016고정245
명예훼손
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The gist of the instant facts charged was that the Defendant was dissatisfied with the victim C’s failure to properly pay the time limit money when he/she received the time limit money.

Around 12:00 on October 30, 2015, the Defendant: (a) had no fact that the victim ended with another male; (b) had been in the alley mine located in the Suwon-dong in Busan-gu, Busan-do; (c) in the market market where the market merchants and 20 people are heard, the Defendant she was sick, and was ill, as a result, with the victim’s “the same year as this gue gue is attached to this gue, so the Defendant was infected, and was attached to D.

"A sound, thereby openly pointing out false facts, thereby damaging the reputation of the victim."

2. The facts charged of this case are crimes falling under Article 307(2) of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s explicit intent under Article 312(2) of the Criminal Act. According to the records, the victim can be acknowledged as having withdrawn his/her wish to punish the defendant after the prosecution of this case. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow