The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The facts charged by the Defendant is the same year for the following reasons: (a) the victim I (before the opening:J) of the “E” from the “E” page of the operation of D, D, F, G, H, etc. located in J on January 1, 2017, which was heard by the police officer in J in J-si; and (b) the Defendant: (c) the period under which the Defendant was placed to the opening that he would have been employed by J.

Scuama is a fladro, which is the same year as the gue gue gue gue gue gue gue gue gue gue gue gue gue gue gue gugue

It is the year in which it was not known.

In other words, “the victim was openly insultingd.”

2. We examine the judgment. This is a crime falling under Article 311 of the Criminal Act and can be prosecuted only upon the filing of a complaint under Article 312(1). Since the prosecution of this case is revoked after the institution of the prosecution of this case, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparag. 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.