logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2018.10.18 2018고정837
명예훼손
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On February 7, 2018, the Defendant committed the crime at around 16:40 on February 7, 2018, at the center for senior citizens in the Daegu Suwon-gu C, the president of the center for senior citizens, the president of the center for senior citizens, and the secretary at the center for senior citizens, etc., who damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out false facts by stating, “Notwithstanding the fact that there was no sexual intercourse between the victim D (M, 77 years old), the victim D (M) of the same year, women h of the same year, she she she, and she she she she, and she she she shes, she she shes and she fests, and she shes down a low gue visit.”

2. The Defendant committed the crime of February 8, 2018: (a) around 14:00 on the place indicated in paragraph (1) around February 8, 2018; (b) 10 people, such as the president of the center for older persons, the president of the center for older persons, and the president of the general affairs; and (c) notwithstanding the fact that the victim was remarried, the Defendant was aware of the fact that the victim had been married for the same year.

v. N. P. L. P. L. L. P. L. L. H. H. H.

The honor of the victim was damaged by openly pointing out false facts by concluding that it was re-refilled and “Cropic and Fropic People.”

3. On February 22, 2018, the Defendant committed a crime on February 22, 2018: (a) around 17:40 around 22, 2018, at the place where 10 people are located, such as the president of the center for older persons, the president of the center for older persons, the general director, etc.; (b) the fact that the victimized person did not have any mixture of water with the oil in the oil diameter; and (c) notwithstanding the fact that the victimized person did not have remarried, the Defendant would be able to find out the breathbbbbbing

I would like to throw away the sususitus as a part of Ivoking.

A male tag shall be placed three times and a male tag shall be placed. The male tag shall be placed.

v. The term “the same year has been the same as the one,” thereby impairing the honor of the victim by openly pointing out false facts.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement of the witness D;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Recording records;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing family relations certificates;

1. Article 307(2) of the Criminal Act provides that the pertinent provision of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment for the crime (the choice of penalty) shall be applied.

arrow