1. Of the judgment of the first instance, the part against the Defendants is modified as follows. A.

Defendant C.

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation as to this part of the facts is that of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part pertaining to the Defendants is identical to the corresponding part of the grounds for the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, they are cited in accordance with

2. Determination as to claims against the Defendants

A. The reason why the court should explain this part of the cost of defect and repair arising from the apartment of this case is as follows, since the part of the "cost of defect and repair arising from the apartment of this case" from No. 7 to No. 18 of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the "cost of defect and repair arising from the apartment of this case" to No. 7 of the judgment of the court of first instance, this part is cited in accordance with the main sentence of

Part 8 from Part 3 to Part 10 below, "the table" and "the grounds for recognition" shall be followed in the following part:

【The details of the cost of repair of defects are different from those of the judgment of the court of first instance; hereinafter the same shall apply). It reflects this in accordance with attached Form 1 of the judgment of first instance (attached Form 1).

(3) As to the portion of 10 years before the pre-use inspection, "No. 25 years before the pre-use inspection", "No. 258,023,359,021, 157 252,707,450,613,09, 49, 8219, 226,754 42,792,870,8704, 471,763, 47, 8370, 8370, 8374, 167, 74, 187, 74, 749, 2956, 284, 361, 465, 257, 364, 167, 475, 467, 475, 168, 475, 167, 475, 2784, 257